( search forums )
Deleted Topic
Soldat Forums - -
Deleted User
November 30, 1999, 12:00 am

Alamo
January 18, 2004, 1:30 am
You have kinda lot of suggestions right? :) Sure it would be fun, but what influence would it have on the gameplay (except from taking away hiding places). It would just be some eye candy wouldn't it???

Bovineplethora
January 18, 2004, 3:43 am
quote:Originally posted by Alamo
You have kinda lot of suggestions right? :) Sure it would be fun, but what influence would it have on the gameplay (except from taking away hiding places). It would just be some eye candy wouldn't it???


Actually, it could be a whole new tactic. You could dig holes/bases/tunnels, get a new edge on attacks and such. The land would have to "refill" after a while, or you cuold completely destroy the place.

Sekushi
January 18, 2004, 7:03 am
Lol, yeah. We'd just fall, respawn, fall, respawn. Destructable terrain would be cool, like when you fire an m79, a small crater is left. Or, maybe, you could sever the bridge cables. Then again, the fancier Soldat gets, the more memory is required to run it, and one thing I like about Soldat is it's simplicity in itself.

Inquisitor
January 18, 2004, 12:56 pm
not a good idea. buy yourself WORMS.

DesFS
January 19, 2004, 5:19 am
Too true. Soldat is great because of it's simplicity along with the carnage. I'd rather have this idea for eye candy instead of strategy. It might ruin the game if it was.

Worms was great though. :)

Sekushi
January 19, 2004, 6:02 am
Lol, now we see from eye-to-eye. :D

sudden_death
January 19, 2004, 1:56 pm
It could be an option, maybe you could choose "Destructible Terrain" as a check box or maybe it could be an option in the map maker under the special terrain styles?

Inquisitor
January 19, 2004, 3:36 pm
maybe it's too difficult to program?

Alamo
January 19, 2004, 4:46 pm
Yep Inquisitor is right... I guess too that it's kinda hard to program :)
sudden_death: if everything ppl want to be an option you would have three pages full of checkboxes...

Alamo
January 19, 2004, 4:49 pm
Yep Inquisitor is right... I guess too that it's kinda hard to program :)
sudden_death: if everything ppl want to be an option you would have three pages full of checkboxes...

Inquisitor
January 19, 2004, 6:12 pm
lol :) doppelpost

Sekushi
January 19, 2004, 7:10 pm
Lol, not even the big games [UT, BF1942, MoH] have destrutable terrain. :/

Alamo
January 19, 2004, 7:57 pm
look at Red Faction... Didn't add much to gameplay either...

F842
January 19, 2004, 8:27 pm
I think that instead of destroyable terrain the terrain should be more interactive. so it burns or smokes for a bit where grenades and flamers have scorched it. that would make the landscape after an intense battle quite kewl, with smoking soildeverywhere for a bit.

Alamo
January 20, 2004, 4:20 pm
smoke after explosions will be implemented in 1.2. The rest sounds cool :) Like just a 'burnt' scenery after explosions right?

bLaStEr
January 20, 2004, 9:15 pm
Maybe explosions would cause only very small hole to the ground? So you could use that as cover for example. (bullets wouldnt eat the ground)

Sekushi
January 20, 2004, 11:47 pm
If the holes were small, they wouldn't provide much cover. Plus, holes would mess up sprinting, every time you got goin', you'd fall into a hole, and mess up your rhythm. Not cool.

NightCabbage
January 25, 2004, 3:25 am
Alrighty, 2 things here:

a) Destructible TERRAIN

b) Destructible SCENERY

Both are completely different and non-related.

Destructible terrain won't work with the way Michal has programmed Soldat, so it's not gonna happen.

On the other hand, destructible scenery is possible to put in, and might be a bit of extra fun?
eg. Remember Total Annihilation, lol...
In that you could even set one tree on fire, and if the wind was right, it would set other trees near it on fire, that was FUN :)



Destructible SCENERY = yes.

Camping_Carl
January 27, 2004, 4:07 pm
I love the idea w00t

eesahe
January 29, 2004, 5:52 pm
Yeah, Destructible terrain would be hard to program (not impossible thought), and it would also Suck with a big s.

Destructible scenery is a good idea, thought at the end of the match all the scenery would have burnt down :)

Slamex
February 10, 2004, 7:44 pm
Exploding barrels are part of almost all shooting games. I want them in soldat too!

Josh1l6
February 11, 2004, 8:14 pm
Having fire leave burn marks and blood leave...smears wouldn't detract from the gameplay, and it would make Soldat look cooler. And imagine tracking a wounded flag carrier by his blood trail. There'd be a new incentive to pick up a medkit.

Alamo
February 11, 2004, 9:09 pm
yay that's cool. I want marks on the ground from blood and explosions. That's cool! Like a hunting mode with hunting maps? :D

mr.t
February 21, 2004, 4:01 pm
i think there should be destructable bunkers and stuff that are the only things that can be destroyed. No idea why....

Eagle1
February 22, 2004, 5:57 am
Inquisitor Posted - 18 Jan 2004 : 12:56:12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
not a good idea. buy yourself WORMS.


True True

Toumaz
February 24, 2004, 2:25 pm
Ever heard of a game called Liero?

HOBBES
February 24, 2004, 5:56 pm
I dont like the idea. Think about maps like ctf Death. It would make many things inpossible, and its hard to carry out in a game like Soldat.

DeMonIc
May 30, 2004, 9:57 am
CTF_death HAS scenery?Thats new.Though, i like the idea... burning forest in lagrange.. no more sniping lame ass baretters :D YAAAY XD

megabrain
June 8, 2004, 2:01 pm
Hmm... Wouldn't it be fun if scenery could catch fire by using /smoke and burn people hiding? like it could spread and.... watch out barretards =)

psyko
June 18, 2004, 7:49 pm

why can't we just napalm them...?

heheheheh...


the problem with exploding oil drums is their cheesiness...

I think on the whole destructable scenery is not a bad idea...

although it would be hard to resist setting fire and blowing up every bit of scenery on the map...

Sjuge
June 20, 2004, 7:59 pm
Destructable scenery + Lagrange + BBQ Mode = PARTY!!!

That would rule... A LOT.
Haha, no more camping behind oil drums, huh? BOOM!
Destructable scenery, scorched and bloody soil = Good ideas.
Thumbs up.

Svirin Kerath
June 22, 2004, 5:43 pm
it would be easy to have craters... everytime a grenade or m79 shot hits the ground, a "crater" from the scenery thing pops up automatically. there would be different kinds and shapes, randomly chosen for variety and depending on the weapon. i just thought it woul be cool... and easy to do. smoke would accompany... that would be awesome...

juhdi91
June 27, 2004, 10:20 pm
i wouldnt like it. it would be like worms then and u could blow the ground off from the flag so it would fall away from the map