( search forums )
Explosion Rag-doll
Soldat Forums - Soldat Talk - Game Improvements / Suggestions
Unlucky 13
September 12, 2004, 3:31 am
I think that there should be a semi-ragdoll effect after being hit by an explosion. This would be kind of complex, but maybe they could land sprawled on the ground? That would stop M79 jumps and things...

I searched to find nothing...

Cookie.
September 12, 2004, 3:44 am
i like it ^__^ maybe as option or just in reall mode tho i dunno

peemonkey
September 12, 2004, 4:29 am
there should be a way to fall backwards, and this should be a trigger.

BManx2000
September 12, 2004, 4:53 am
quote:Originally posted by Unlucky 13
That would stop M79 jumps and things...


What the hell? M79 jumps were PURPOSELY PUT BACK IN!

...Anyway, so basically what you're saying is evey time you get hit by a nade, you would go sprawling and be defenseless? Methinks not.

Spectral
September 12, 2004, 5:20 am
meh, once you die from an explosion, that somewhat happens I guess, and ruining the m79 jumps would make me very disgruntled :P

Unlucky 13
September 12, 2004, 7:00 am
OK let me rephrase that. To make M79 jumps more realistic and no overspamming through them...

MikeShinoda.pheonix
September 12, 2004, 8:42 am
... id have to say no

DeMonIc
September 12, 2004, 9:42 am
I like it, but...
...well, I love to m79 jump from our base infront of the enemy flag carrier and than chainsaw him...
So unless we can define this more precisely, than I think it's undiscussable.
But thumbs up :)

blackdevil0742
September 12, 2004, 10:23 am
I like it
DOWN WITH THE M79 JUMPS!!!
hehe...

Michal
September 12, 2004, 3:25 pm
I don't really like the M79 jump, and I don't like the soldats stiff stance when being flung through the air. I like this idea, it would make stuff look better and be more realistic. I don't think that the soldat would be defenseless, because you would still be able to shoot as you are flung. Maybe it should be so you land in the prone position.

Sprocket
September 13, 2004, 11:03 am
i totaly agree

Element_101
September 13, 2004, 11:13 am
The M79 jump as become so much a part of soldat, I dont think you would get a very good response if you took it away.

DT
September 15, 2004, 3:47 pm
law... makes a good explosion... the feeling of you know its going to hit... and thier body just falls apart when you hit it.

Toumaz
September 16, 2004, 8:44 am
M79 jumps are kind of lame in my opinion.

Jaz
September 16, 2004, 4:28 pm
You suck assh. M79 jump is going nowhere...if M79 jump left soldat so would I. People that use barret and autos are kind of lame in my opinion. Don't make the m79 any weaker than it is. Barret has long scope, straighter bullet and 1 hit kill everytime. M79 has 1 hit kill if you get a direct hit, if you miss it just hurts them, it also has the m79 jump.....not as useful as longscope.Stop trying to weaken the m79.

kevith
September 16, 2004, 5:15 pm
Yeah yeah... everybody's own favorite weapon is the weakest and everybody else's is too strong. We went through quite a long period without m79 jumps and Soldat was just fine. I'm not saying we should take conking away (I actually like it) but it really doesn't matter all that much.

wunderbear
September 17, 2004, 9:18 pm
To not stop m79 jumps, why not have it for other people's nades and m79's?

*I mean other people's nades aimed at you. Your own won't do it.*

I know i will be flamed for that.

Sprocket
September 17, 2004, 11:51 pm
iT should be randomized... so if you're low on HP... you get blown away..
if you have Full HP, you crouch a little.
that wouldnt be hard to make

Unlucky 13
September 18, 2004, 3:43 am
^What the two above posts said^

dr.ON
September 23, 2004, 6:50 pm
disagree! beacause i like rocket jumping' its just helpful/fun