( search forums )
(moved) Internet Gamer Levels
Soldat Forums - Misc - The Bash Pit
__SnoOpy__
April 12, 2005, 5:29 am
[URL]

I'm still working on it. When I finished it I'll post full version in here.

MercyM
April 12, 2005, 5:31 am
Ehm, what it actually is? Just a topic? :P

EndertheXenocide
April 12, 2005, 5:36 am
Looks interesting. Didn't really feel like reading all of the posts though. Just tell us when you get the finally version done. So we can rate it.

Melba
April 12, 2005, 3:21 pm
The replies in that forum reflect my thoughts exactly when i saw this.

Sir, are you retarded?

b00stA
April 12, 2005, 3:47 pm
Accuracys are estimated to be around 90.2881 percent.
Haha, I love how you pulled that number out of nowhere.

STEELIX
April 12, 2005, 4:06 pm
2-3. Low-Medium Transitional Intermediate
Lawl.

Denacke
April 12, 2005, 6:24 pm
wow you're silly oO can this move to the bash pit?

zoldat
April 12, 2005, 6:32 pm
31-108
OMG SUPER MASTER MEGA PLAYER WITHOUT LIMIT

Icarius
April 12, 2005, 7:11 pm
This guide is wrong.

Norse
April 12, 2005, 8:00 pm
I dont quite understand it 0o Do we rate ourselves according to your criteria?

DT
April 12, 2005, 8:40 pm
i'm 3.5.. oh you don't have that in yet

Hitman
April 12, 2005, 8:49 pm
That is unbelievably pointless.

Congratulations.

BManx2000
April 13, 2005, 1:17 am
CONCURNESS

peemonkey
April 13, 2005, 2:18 am
i eat babies. [IMAGE]

frogboy
April 13, 2005, 2:26 am
I'd comments on this, but I doesn't seem to are able to understands you well.

m00`
April 13, 2005, 2:53 am
snoopy you wasted 8 years of your life, even though i dont belive that you did spend 8 years on that hehe

Hitman
April 13, 2005, 3:04 am
If that's the case, then he is one sad muther[IMAGE]er.

The Geologist
April 13, 2005, 3:51 am
quote:Originally posted by b00stAAccuracys are estimated to be around 90.2881 percent.
Haha, I love how you pulled that number out of nowhere.


Forget pulling it out of nowhere...half of it (probably) isn't even real. Claiming to be accurate down to that level is, among other things, inaccurate. Makes me wonder how such a number was reached. Hope it wasn't just pulled off a calculator...

Icarius
April 13, 2005, 4:05 am
As I said, this is wrong. To the point where I need to find you and put you to death for making such a stupid [IMAGE]ing guide.

__SnoOpy__
April 13, 2005, 5:11 am
Done.
Comment on it if you want

Vijchtidoodah
April 13, 2005, 5:34 am
How can we comment on it when we don't have a clue what it is?

And Geologist is right, 90% is waaay too accurate for even the best players.

If you want real, solid data, try going through the proper statistical methods - chiefly, actual research.

The Geologist
April 13, 2005, 11:29 pm
91.9761035%

No. You are not accurate down to this level. Way too many numbers after the decimal. Do you know what significant figures are? Look 'em up and try your math again. :/

Outcast
April 13, 2005, 11:58 pm
X-3. Self-Nominated "Legend(ary)"z
"Only TRUEEE Legendz plzzz"
"You need to be great to play with Legends"
"LeGeNdZ only no n00bs"
So on.

Hey, thats me

Icarius
April 14, 2005, 4:42 am
5-2. Legendary
Normal players will not be able to see these players in normal places. Players in this stage are just.. Can't explain. For example, those who compete in World series.

This is bull[IMAGE] out of n00bies for my own amusement.

__SnoOpy__
April 18, 2005, 3:39 am
I updated it again.
I'm starting to take it seriously,
check out the "additional" levels ;)

Vijchtidoodah
April 18, 2005, 4:39 am
You still haven't told us what it's for. Explain that before you add anything to it.

__SnoOpy__
April 18, 2005, 6:37 am
The use of a thing is depended on the user.
Read for reference,
take it as joke,
make a contrast,
et cetera.

Vijchtidoodah
April 18, 2005, 6:46 am
What? That's like telling someone to interpret your words however they want to. In fact, that's exactly what you're doing. You must have had a clear purpose to this in order to spend eight years on it (--and you're only just now beginning to take it seriously?), instead of making an arbitrary table of numbers.