how bout we take out sg's cause their tooo cheap!!!!!
and make new weapons. i'd love to have a nife launcher or sumthing.
knife rules but a lil to slow

o lord please don't start another thread liek this, personally i don't like them but i don't think much people want to debate this agin

1.2 has already solved the sg problem so stick your thumb up your a$$ and wait.


PS: Search for sg and enjoy the fruits of 50,000,000,000 topics about sgs

i think you need to realize that their does not mean "they are."
"they're," however, does.
and then i think you need to read more of these forum's before
shoving your dirty two cents in my face.
and then i think you need to get an middle school education before
posting, so you don't sound like a 3rd grade idiot.
and then i think you should just walk off a cliff, and save the world
some grief.

Wow, wish I'd never looked...

and then you know what i think alpha, i think that you should probably play the game, as is evidenced that you havent in that other thread

...
go read the other thread again.
read between the lines.
because i can't.

Ok just BE QUIET! The Stationary Guns are very different in 1.2, just bloody wait for the next version. Did you not think that beta testers would complain about them as well. SILLY BOY!

Couple of things, leathaldeath.

1. The topic of stationary guns has been argued to death. It doesn't need another thread.

2. Starting a thread with the topic: LOOK AT THIS PPL!!!!! is a stupid thing to do. Everybody could use that as their topic, and it wouldn't get more people to read. It would just be confusing.

3. Here are the words you can't spell: Lethal, SGs, they're, knife, something, li'l' and too. Please get off these forums and stop wasting our time.

nearly half the threads in this forum are whining, what is wrong with you people if you dont like the game stop playing it or at least use a thread all ready made up for whining instead, geez!! i hope a fridge falls in you.

wtf is up with all these new newbs? LOL

All these Nerf this Nerf that Topics are so annonying!

alpha shut up u dipsh1t
leave him alone.. where do u get off hasseling a guy just for posting what he thinks
who do u think u are
"the forum police?"

same i could ask from you gi.joe :/

As NuZZ said 1.2 sg's should be fine. As for the bext one wtf is a knife launcher?!? and btw knife is fine as it is, if it were to get any better it would be the next n00b wep which I dont want it to be, since it's my primary weapon. Watch the knife video to see that it's good enough lol ;-) http://selfkill.com/webv2/content/sd_redir.php?id=80

lol, ty blaster...
i thought my post was justified, so i posted it. people shouldn't just
jump in forums and have their first post be a "gay blah gay gay i'm gay" post.
btw, metal slug rulez.

so ure saying that u are the forum police?
blaster... what are u on abt.... "same u cud ask from me?"
wtf thats pretty ambiguous mate....

i'm entitled to my opinion and you're entitled to yours. doesn't mean you're
right though. does mean i am. -_-
and i belive that blaster was stating that your replial to my post wasn't
justified because of the reason you were posting. you replied due to premise A:

Premise 1) Hasseling a guy just for posting what he thinks is wrong.

but your own post violated that premise:

Premise 2) posting a diatribe against a person is considered hasseling.
Premise 3) gi.joe posted a short diatrabe against alpha.
Conclusion a) gi.joe just hasseled alpha.
Conclusion b) gi.joe just violated his own premise.
Corollary ii) violating self-formulated premises is hypocritical.
Corollary Conclusion A) gi.joe is hypocritical.

still ambiguous? or did i use words too big for you..."mate?"

the cause justifies the means

oh and btw
have u heard of a guy called blag? u 2 wud go very nicely together...
maybe u cud be dictionary buddies, swapping annecdotes and catch phrases with words youve both retrieved from a dictionary.. in a feeble attempt to make yourself seem smarter when actually ure just pathetic..
nothing that lethal death posted justified what u sed about him u dumass...

all he did was make a simple spelling error.. does that mean he shud apologize?

"and then i think you need to read more of these forums before shoving your dirty 2 cents in my face"

youre telling someone else to read more about the forums! WHOS HYPOCRITICAL NOW>>>???

please keep your senseless drivel to yourself... wether YOU think they are justified or not...

i fail to follow your flawed logic for obvious reasons: it isn't logical.
and i think your first statement was supposed be "the ends justifies the means."
which is the philosophy known as "teleology."

oh and btw
have u heard of a guy called leathaldeath? u 2 wud go very nicely together...
maybe u cud b bed buddies, swapping bodily fluids.
youve both posted pathetic outbursts of stupidity on the boards... in a feeble
attempt at i'm not quite sure what... when actually ure just moronic...
nothing that i posted justified what you sed about me u dumass...
all i did was point out your hypocratical behavior, which you continue to induge
in... does that mean i shud apologize?

"and then i think you need to read more of these forums before shoving your dirty 2 cents in my face"

i'm telling someone else to read more about the forums. i'm not being hypocritical.

please keep YOUR senseless drivel to YOURSELF. because i'm right.

LARF!!
ok so me telling you to get off his back wasnt justified?
nice one, u were flaming him for MAKING A SPELLING ERROR!! again i will say this because it doesnt seem to have sunk into your thickass head
YOU ARE NOT THE FORUM POLICE>.. people can make spelling errors, and it is OK!

" *joe stands up and provides alpha with a mock standing ovation"
"your ability for senselss mimicry is fascinating"

how exactly are u right downer?

guess i was wrong, i guess people love debating it =P

1) it wasn't a spelling error. it was a gramatical one.
2) that wasn't the only reason why i replied to his post, which
would be evident if you could comprehend what you read.
3) you contine to be hypocratical in behavior, and idiotic in nature. thus i am forced to the following statement: i refuse to continue this pointless flaming with an opponent who cannot understand simple logic. i guess ignorance really is bliss. i can only hope that you do not have kids.

lol that phrase is becomming a little cliche, try to come up with somethin a little original next time...

ok so what were the other reasons for u replying to his post ?

dude if any logic at all belonged to your posts we wudnt be having this discussion right now...

if we followed your logic:

1) fighting against those that are trying to abolish freedom of speech wud be labelled as surpression itself..
~dumass

2) if i, along with the rest of the NORMAL human beings belonging to this earth were to stop having children, as u say we shud.. we wud be left with a seething mass of sh1t full of morons by the name of aLpHaNuMe12iK.. (not a very good idea)

shut up f00l... uve just been owned